Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul's avatar

Interesting text, as always. What I find missing in your analysis, however, is the underlying reality of energy and other resources.

From where I'm standing, it looks like Europe, possessing very little in terms of energy, has embarked on a path of enslaving the rest of the world through control of the financial system and global organizations, using the US as a henchman that strongarms anybody who dares not comply. The various anybodies have had enough and have grown strong enough to tell the West to shove it, while the West has grown weaker, well pretty much utterly decadent, the advantages they had in the past, such as technological superiority, gone.

Europe has realized the deep shit it's in and is attempting to do something about it. The right thing to do, as BOOM has suggested would be to engage in global diplomacy as an impartial player, to promote education to be the center of knowledge, to be the world's culture center, stuff like that. All long-term efforts, plus the FUCKING IDIOTS in charge, the ones featured in the above clip, don't have the brains to formulate visions of this nature.

So, war it is. Another crusade to conquer Russia and steal its riches. Beats me why they think they can pull it off this time. Did I say they're FUCKING IDIOTS? Oh, I did.

Expand full comment
GregB's avatar

I couldn’t agree more about the unelected, unaccountable EU Commission and Empress Ursula.

You write about Schuman but, arguably, leave out the most important person, Jean Monnet (1888-1979). He can truly be called the principal Founding Father of the European Union (EU). Along with the other three “Founding Fathers”, Arthur Salter, Altiero Spinelli and Paul-Henri Spaak he was a man of high influence but unlike the Founding Fathers of the USA, he preferred to work in the background influencing and manipulating.

After WW1, at the age of 31, Monnet was appointed the League of Nations Deputy Secretary General.

The League was made up of the four divisions, a Secretariat, Council, Assembly and a Court of International Justice that Europeans will recognise today, in the European Union. Monnet expected the League to create World Order, “by its moral force, by appealing to public opinion and thanks to customs that would ultimately prevail.” It should also be noted that the Secretariat “was not to consist of national delegates but of International servants whose first loyalty was to the League.” an idea that he took forward into the European Commission. Monnet was frustrated by the power of national vetos: “I was impressed with the power of a nation that can say no to an international body that has no supranational power. Goodwill between men and nations is not enough.”

From Salters 1931 paper:

“the commercial and tariff policy of European States is so central and crucial a part of their general policy, the receipts from Customs are so central and substantial a part of their revenues, that a common political authority, deciding for all Europe what tariffs should be imposed and how they should be distributed, would be for every country almost as important as, or even more important than, the national Governments, and would in effect reduce the latter to the status of municipal authorities.”

He proposed that the United States of Europe had to be a political reality with a Secretariat, Council of Ministers, parliamentary assembly and a Court of Justice, based on the structure of the League of Nations, but that the central source of this authority had to be reserved for The Secretariat, the permanent body of civil servants loyal to the new organisation not to member countries. He understood that the Council of Ministers would always have national loyalties, so its power had to be curbed.

Churchill's war cabinet agreed on a draft “Proclamation of an Anglo-French Union” that was produced by Monnet, Salter and Churchill's advisor, Desmond Morton. Churchill, however, removed a reference to a common currency. An enthusiastic de-Gaulle telephoned it through to the the French government but the response was hostile, fearing British dominion in this union. Marshal Petain described it as a “fusion with a corpse” and sued for peace with Germany instead.

Monnet moved to work for the British supply council in Washington, where he discussed his plans for the European Coal and Steel Union with Paul-Henri Spaak, the pre-war Belgium Prime Minister. He used his time to influence Harold MacMillan, who was to become British Prime Minister in 1957, and top US government officials with his views for a future Europe. In 1943 he became a member of the provisional French Government, commenting:

“There will be no peace in Europe, if the states are reconstructed on the basis of national sovereignty with all that implies on terms of prestige politics and economic protectionism.”

I have quoted from a note I wrote in 2021. The whole note is reproduced at:

https://alfredtheo.wordpress.com/jean-monnet-the-european-union-founding-father/

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts